UPDATE on Age Issues

BreastQuest

Retired Site Admin
Lifetime VIP
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
29,146
Reaction score
59,288
Location
a distant suburb of Atlantis
While some countries allow the age of consent to be between 14-16, and after a lot of posts, complaints, including Reports about girls under the age of 18 being posted, admin has decided that any girls known to be under 18, are not to be posted.

So, yes. Those girls threads who are know to be u.a., have been / will be deleted.

If you suspect a thread of containing underage content, either submit a Report, or PM a Staff member, and it will be investigated. However, it would be very helpful to have supporting evidence (while a photo showing her celebrating her 16th birthday, whose to say, it's not a throwback pic?).

After receiving 2 Reports on a certain girl who we all know is only 17, I also received additional information from another member that even discussing said girl can result in problems for the board. Ref: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/alle...extradited-united-states-face-federal-charges
https://www.justice.gov/criminal-ceos/citizens-guide-us-federal-law-child-pornography and https://definitions.uslegal.com/c/criminal-facilitation/

So, I modified Rule 1a, https://www.titsintops.com/phpBB2/i...please-read-important-important-important.41/ . Please, DO NOT discuss any girl who is known/suspected of being underage.

I also added her name to the Do Not Post List (same link, as above).
 
Last edited:
finally
 
It's for the best.
 
Update initial post. Please read it.

I've started a new "prom" thread for 18+. Check it out.
Link?

Though, how can you be absolutely sure?

Emendy went to the senior prom since she was a Freshman.
 
Update initial post. Please read it.


Link?

Though, how can you be absolutely sure?

Emendy went to the senior prom since she was a Freshman.

It's not literally a prom thread (this time), just a thread for busty gals in formal & cocktail dresses. How can I be absolutely sure? You'll have no doubts about what I will post there when you see it.
 
Can this get the most views? I know we are here for mainstream jack off entertainment which makes it ironic, but let’s keep this mother fucking shit age clean. Idgaf if it’s in Antarctica legal age is 14, DO NOT POST ANY GIRLS BELOW THE AGE OF 18<——— EIGHT FUCKING TEEN. Need to do further research? Fucking do it, there’s no excuse for underages to be on this site. This has to be my favorite post on this fucking site seriously. Thank you admin. Big props on your administration optics :).
I cannot quite follow you here.

There is a reason not to post "underage" girls here: it is illegal in the USA, and the USA has a lot of means and ways to come down hard on a forum like this. Self-protection.

But somehow your post does give a quite different vibe. It seems that you are somehow personally offended if someone thinks a woman below some arbitrary age line can still be acknowledged.
If I got this wrong, I apologize. But what you wrote didn't give a lot of hints about a rational background behind your expletive-filled rant.
 
Last edited:
I cannot quite follow you here.

There is a reason not to post "underage" girls here: it is illegal in the USA, and the USA has a lot of means and ways to come down hard on a forum like this. Self-protection.

But somehow your post does give a quite different vibe. It seems that you are somehow personally offended if someone thinks a woman below some arbitrary age line can still be acknowledged.
If I got this wrong, I apologize. But what you wrote didn't give a lot of hints about a rational background behind your impletive-filled rant.

I'm pretty sure he's been as blunt and direct about his sentiments towards underage girls being on this forum as one can be.

I think it's you who's looking to pick a fight, because I see a passive aggressive insult in your comment. And I say, let it go. Because if this is leading to where I think it is, I'd like to point out two rules.

1a) NO media, or discussion of girls under 18 is allowed.

5a) Please, no flaming or abuse.

Let's move on in peace.
 
I'm pretty sure he's been as blunt and direct about his sentiments towards underage girls being on this forum as one can be.

I think it's you who's looking to pick a fight, because I see a passive aggressive insult in your comment. And I say, let it go. Because if this is leading to where I think it is, I'd like to point out two rules.

1a) NO media, or discussion of girls under 18 is allowed.

5a) Please, no flaming or abuse.

Let's move on in peace.
Just as the quoted poster, I have the right to proclaim my "sentiments", and I stand behind everything I said. He didn't provide any reason for his enthusiastic support of this rule, he seemed to be very set on the "eight fucking teen" limit, he proclaimed that other opinions didn't matter to him and his post was filled with "coarse language".

I already stated in my post why I think this "no underage" rule is valid. I also preemptively apologized if I misunderstood the poster. I also did not break any rule: I did not "discuss" girls under 18, but the attitude of a poster regarding this topic. I did not flame and I did not abuse. And I disagree that stating a personal opinion in a way that doesn't use "fucking" in every sentence is "passive aggressive".

I agree to the "no underage" rule. I have a rational reason to do that, and I basically do not care. But I cannot stand these "holier than you and fuck off if you disagree with me" types.

Peace.
 
Closing to comments.
Let's agree we're all on the same page here.
Thanks.
 
Top